Get Performance Resources.

Author Archives: jordan


Daniel Hicker is a Head Athletic Performance coach in Major League Soccer. He formerly worked for the San Jose Earthquakes FC and is currently with the Columbus Crew FC. Daniel has been incorporating sports technology since starting in college coaching in 2012. In 2014, he was coaching with the San Jose Sharks and was introduced to VBT via Tendo Units. Seeing how athletes took to the tech and improved their performance in and outside the weight room, he was convinced.
Once Daniel was introduced to the seamlessness of Perch, he integrated it into training sessions, using objective data to connect with how athletes were subjectively feeling to make smarter training decisions. Daniel regularly tracks data, no longer relying on 1RM tests to see where athletes are and adjusting daily workouts for optimal long-term strength development. With the Quakes and in Major League Soccer, he used VBT to understand how lifting impacts performance. This lead to more intent in training sessions and helping traditionally non-lifters buy into strength training.



Daniel utilizes VBT to better understand where an athlete’s readiness and fatigue is, pivoting if needed. He uses metrics to help his athletes understand the correlation between weight lifting and on-field performance. For athletes who don’t love to lift, VBT can help them understand the importance. Daniel monitors his Major League Soccer players peak velocity for any explosive movement and mean velocity for any strength movement, building a database of performance to refer back to over time.


VELOCITY RANGES Can be helpful to educate athletes in the weight room with performances outside of it

TECHNOLOGY CAN HELP Paint a picture of athletes for athletes and for coaches. Don’t overcomplicate it, but definitely incorporate it and remember to start slow!

LET IT GUIDE CULTURE Soccer players traditionally don’t love lifting, so using VBT, we can create a weight room culture that is about output, and less about maximal loads lifted. This is huge for us.  



KEEP IT SIMPLE! Daniel is always looking for long term athletic development, weight room technology is a tool that can help get athletes there, but he always refers back to his philosophy of keeping quality, keeping it simple, and getting long term athletic development right.

USE DATA TO EDUCATION Athletes on what they feel and connecting outputs on the field with the weight room

CONNECT YOUR PROGRAMMING WITH ON FIELD OUTPUTS TOO Data isn’t just for the athletes, you need to collect it and connect it, backing off or pushing hard as needed  



Daniel originally pushed back against having too much tech in the weight room, nervous that it would cause his athletes to hover around a tablet instead of keep focus. Once he integrated Perch and saw how simple and seamless it was, it was a no-brainer. More than anything, soccer players aren’t traditionally big on lifting, but using VBT technology, Daniel is able to build buy-in by creating a culture that focuses on quality of movement, over quantity lifted.

This simple switch allows athletes to understand why they’re lifting, and see the impact it has with objective and immediate data. There’s no pushback against loading up because the athletes can see that they’re in the velocity zones to perform well. With load secondary to performance, his athletes trust him more. Creating that trust and buy-in with anything is huge, especially with new weight room technology.  



Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and LinkedIn and like us on Facebook . And more on our YouTube Page!

Determining an athlete’s 1RM is an important part of developing a training program. A 1RM can help coaches program appropriate loads through training cycles. They can then retest the athlete’s 1RM to determine if the athlete got stronger. With new technology, it is possible to accurately predict athlete 1RMs. This allows coaches to assess athletes within lifting sessions and saves time otherwise reserved for testing days. There are multiple ways to do this, but this is our favorite.



Traditionally, the maximum load an athlete can lift without failure has been determined just like that: the athlete performs an exercise with progressively heavier loads at maximal effort until they no longer can. This poses 3 primary concerns:

  1. Time: Coaches testing all athletes on the team takes time. Each athlete must keep lifting increasingly heavy weights until they no longer can. While there is something to be said for the energy in the weight room, this requires coaches to set aside valuable training days to test performance, instead of assessing while training.
  2. Injury Risk: As athletes try to go beyond their 1RM their risk of poor form and injury has been shown to increase, particularly in novice or untrained athletes [1].
  3. Fluctuations: A 1RM can change by up to ±18% day to day due to stressors, fatigue, lack of sleep, or a really good day. The percentage fluctuations are usually much less than that, the fluctuations can still be significant in the grand scheme. Additionally, an athlete should be getting stronger throughout the workout program so any prescribed weights based on the 1RM measured at the beginning of the program are no longer accurate. Prescribing a workout based on the initial 1RM will not account for daily fluctuations or strength gains, potentially leading to under or over training [1].


Just testing a thing or two here.



VBT offers a solution to all of these concerns. An estimated 1RM can be calculated quickly and easily over the course of warm up sets. These MUST be done with maximal intent for this to be an accurate number. Research by Mladen Jovanovic and Dr. Eamonn P. Flanagan determined a simple linear model that can predict 1RM from lighter loads: 

  Load = m(Velocity) + b

In this equation, velocity is equal to the mean velocity for the set at the prescribed load, and m and b are the slope and y-intercept. Using this, an athlete can perform a few warm up sets at their maximum velocity and use the mean velocity output by Perch to solve [1]. This can be done easily with a little bit of algebra, or by using a graphing software. It is also forthcoming into Perch software. To determine the 1RM, plug in the expected velocity for the 1RM, and solve. Voila – an estimated 1RM!



If an athlete’s 1RM velocity is unknown, there are two options:

  1. Perform a set below the 1RM to failure using Perch. One of the many cool things about VBT is that the minimal velocity threshold (MVT) for a given exercise is pretty standard regardless of load [1]. This means that the velocity of the last rep before failure at any load is a good predictor of the velocity of a rep at the 1RM. 
  2. Use the generally accepted MVT for an exercise. For a bench press, the average MVT is 0.15 m/s and for a back squat the accepted velocity is 0.3m/s [1]. Obviously, these are averages and fluctuations between athletes are expected.


Jovanovic and Flanagan’s formula is a good estimate of 1RM. It is also easy to employ in the weightroom each day to tailor an athlete’s program to their 1RM on that particular day. It can account for increases in strength or an athlete having an awesome day, or stressors that are causing an athlete to not be at their peak for a particular session. 

That said, it is never a bad idea to perform a true measure of 1RM from time to time. Do this by one of two ways:

  1. An athlete lifts a lighter load until failure, measuring velocity, and using a 1RM predictor. OR
  2. An athlete lifts heavier loads until they no longer can [1].

Doing both will help check the accuracy of the formula and make sure athletes are getting what they need out of the training program [1]. Lastly and still incredibly important, testing 1RM can be a fun and competitive training environment to enhance team camaraderie and maximal performances!


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and LinkedIn and like us on Facebook . And more on our YouTube Page!


  1. Jovanovic M, Flanagan EP. Research Applications of Velocity Based Strength Training. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning. 2014;21(1):58-69. 
  2. Baechle, T., Earle, R., & National Strength & Conditioning Association (U.S.). (2008). Essentials of strength training and conditioning (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Here at Perch, we talk a lot about lifting heavy things fast. That is because power relies equally on force generation and velocity. Power equals force x velocity: P=F*V. Developing power in athletes can be confusing, in this power we try to break it down into digestible bites.


Power is also arguably the best single measure of an athlete’s overall performance. Lifting heavy loads is only half the equation, just like lifting quickly is also only half the equation. To be a powerful athlete, both the force and velocity components must be developed.




Developing an athlete’s power output across a wide range of loads will help translate weight room sessions to sport specific performance. Research suggests that training at the load that maximizes power output is the most efficient way to develop power at a wide range of loads [1,2]. That said, you must also learn how to recruit muscle fibers with max strength and accelerative-strength/hypertrophy zones and traits. And recruit them quickly with starting strength and speed-strength zones and traits as well. 




Velocity based training devices like Perch can help guide training within your maximal power zone to optimize protocols for you specifically. Remember, the peak power zones span across speed-strength and strength-speed in VBT. This is approximately 0.75 to 1 m/s for strength-speed, and 1 to 1.3 m/s for speed-strength. Maximal power output lives in that zone!

  1. Monitoring: Perch can help determine load with max power output! You will know in watts what your maximal power output is by using Perch and monitoring data over time. This will guide the velocities and loads at which you are most powerful, and what is optimal for you to train at.
  2. Base Loads off of Adaptations: Loads do not have to be based on percent of RM. We know this, but still worth stating. If your loads are based on velocity ranges and specific adaptations you are better off. This will help inform your maximal power outputs instead of just load lifted.
  3. Sport Specific Traits: Understanding the needs analysis of the sport will help you develop power specific to those needs. If an athlete needs a ton of strength, err towards those zones and traits. If they need more speed, err towards those. This is the art of coaching!
  4. Live in Power Zones for Power Development: As stated above, speed-strength (0.75 to 1 m/s) and strength-speed (1 to 1.3 m/s) is where you want to live for maximal power output. To develop power, however, you will want to work across all loads and velocity thresholds. You have to be strong and be able to recruit muscle fibers, but you also have to be fast and recruit them quickly. Working on developing those specific adaptations within their zones will help elicit power.
  5. Maximize Intent: Above all – always lift with maximal intent! Max intent is necessary to be making those neural connections so power can continue to increase. If maximal intent is used, rate of force development across all loads will be optimized. In this way, progress begets progress.

Most of sport is centered around power, as is most athleticism. If you do not know when you are training power, it is hard to optimize training protocols for it. VBT devices can take the guesswork out of your training. With more precise protocols, training is never wasted, and never guessed. We can maximize sessions with exact knowledge via VBT devices like Perch. Train for power, and know when you are doing so!

developing power


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and LinkedIn and like us on Facebook . And more on our YouTube Page!


  1. Kawamori, N., & Haff, G. G. (2004). The Optimal Training Load for the Development of Muscular Power. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(3), 675.<675:totlft>;2
  2. Moss, B. M., Refsnes, P. E., Abildgaard, A., Nicolaysen, K., & Jensen, J. (1997). Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 75(3), 193–199.
  3. Suchomel, T. J., Comfort, P., & Lake, J. P. (2017). Enhancing the Force-Velocity Profile of Athletes Using Weightlifting Derivatives. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 39(1), 10–20. 

What goes up, must come down! This is true in gravity and in weightlifting. However, it is not always controlled outside of the weight room. Because of this, eccentric training is critical for athlete and force development. Eccentric training is the lengthening muscle action. It is arguably the most important part of a muscular contraction to indicate resilience to injury and overall max strength.


Eccentric training protocols are focused at the count in seconds that are spent loading the muscle. For instance, in the squat, continuously descending for 5 seconds before standing up. 




Eccentric overload in training increases muscle hypertrophy, strength, and power. A researcher named Erling Asmussen first introduced eccentric training in 1953 as “excentric” training. This has been popularized in recent years. Training protocols such as Triphasic Training and Cal Dietz, and even French Contrast training, for instance. The eccentric portion of a lift slows down the lengthening of the muscle for a greater challence. Therefore, this helps lead to faster muscle repair, injury prevention, and greater muscle growth.



A strong foundation of strength is important for force development. Above all, eccentric training can help increase overall strength. Researchers Higbie et al., studied concentric and eccentric training of the quadriceps muscle on strength, cross-sectional area and neural activation. They found that eccentric training increased strength in the eccentric muscle action to a larger degree than the concentric training. In other words, there was more efficiency in gaining strength while training eccentric than concentric. 

They also saw greater increases in hypertrophy from the eccentric training group than the concentric training group. Similarly, this means overall strength increases when focusing on the eccentric phase. However, it is hard to manage what you cannot measure, so Perch made it easy to measure eccentric metrics.




With velocity based training, we want to see increases in power output. Researchers Douglas et al., did a systematic review of 40 studies. These studies researched the chronic effects of eccentric training. They found that eccentric training improves concentric muscle power. Eccentric training also improves the stretch shortening cycle performance. This was true with eccentric more than other training modalities. In addition, more effects of eccentric training in this review were muscle hypertrophy and strength.


However, the problem with eccentric training is if athletes hit their eccentric goals every rep. It is difficult to monitor every athlete in a weight room as they train eccentrically. With Perch, every rep eccentric load count and velocity will be recorded and stored. This ensures athletes get the desired adaptation from training. Ultimately, with better strategies to monitor training loads, athletes will continue to get bigger, stronger, and more powerful. This is true as both their seasons and training career progresses. In conclusion, train eccentrically, measure it, manage it!



Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .



  1. Douglas, J., Pearson, S., Ross, A., & McGuigan, M. (2017). Chronic adaptations to eccentric training: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(5), 917.
  2. Higbie, E. J., Cureton, K. J., Warren, G. L. 3rd, & Prior, B. M. (1996). Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 81(5), 2173–81.

Weight room technology and all the data that is derived from it can be daunting to set up and to sift through. This can cause paralysis by analysis. Coaching time is valuable and limited so it is best to limit the amount of energy and time spent on setting up and evaluating velocity based training (VBT).


We have a few ways that can help you not get bogged down by velocity based training. In this post, we will go step by step to shed some light on simplifying the data collection process. Check out some ideas for avoiding paralysis by analysis with weight room technology here:



Keeping setup and tear down of equipment minimal will only help streamline your program when it comes to velocity based training. Some traditional methods of applying VBT are a little bit more involved than they ought to be.

There are three main methods to measure bar speed: linear position transducers (LPTs), wearables or accelerometers, and camera based systems. The problem with most linear position transducers (LPT) is that they have to be placed in just the right place in order to get an accurate reading. That position then changes depending on the exercise performed. Changing the position of LPTs in a weight room setting can be a laborious task even with a large staff.

Using devices that only need to be installed once, or are on the user themselves makes it a lot easier to get moving. But accelerometers can also be cumbersome if every user needs one, or every barbell needs one. There is much greater room for error or missing reps if athletes aren’t compliant. And often athletes don’t want to wear yet another device.

Camera based systems, like Perch, stay mounted on your weight rack. There is no need to change the position of the unit, ever. With Perch, the camera is on a motor and can adjust positions as you adjust exercises. This means more time for coaches to focus on coaching and less on equipment set up and no take down at all (unless you want to).

setup, data analysis, paralysis by analysis



Collecting data is great, but unless you are managing it, it is hard to make great use of it. There are still many VBT devices that have no way of exporting training session data out of the unit and storing them for coaches. Coaches have to monitor the velocities during the session and try to record the ones they see. Otherwise coaches can rely on athletes to record it, but compliance is not always 100%. This eats up precious time that could be spent coaching athletes.

Cloud based systems are ideal for managing data. With Perch, you can send all training session data to the cloud for storage. The cloud will store unlimited data for unlimited users. Coaches can then view or export the data to monitor trends longitudinally. This not only is great to have for current training sessions, but also for looking back to previous sessions to see improvement.



Coaches know that making sense of many athletes training data after a session can take a long time. In order to streamline this, the process must be integrated. Choosing a VBT device that has the capability to take the training data from sessions, store it, and make it easy to understand and manipulate is pivotal. This makes evaluating and presenting the relevant data much easier than ever before. Perch can provides some in app visualizations of workload metrics for your athletes, but it also can export every data point associated with a training session. Picking a VBT device that can do this will make data collection and analysis incredible easy. And will help you avoid paralysis by analysis.

Often, the shear quantity of data can seem daunting as well. VBT is still somewhat new, so understanding velocity zones and some basic principles of programming with VBT can be helpful to start. But then simply collecting data, combining it with subjective data points (“how are you feeling today”) will help illustrate how helpful VBT can be. Just getting started can clarify a ton of mystery around data.

data analysis, paralysis by analysis



Ultimately, weight room technology should work for coaches, not the other way around. Technology needs to be seamlessly integrated to be utilized most effectively. It needs to provide relevant data, not excess noise. And it needs to make that data easy to manipulate and visualize.

We always recommend evaluating different technology to find the best solution for you. With all this said, Perch is always here to help! We have specialists on staff to help you if you have a question, or are completely lost in the process. Check out our contact page for more information, and never hesitate to reach out!


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .

For as long as resistance training has been around, intuition has said that athletes need to lift until failure to see strength improvements. But what if that didn’t have to be the case? Enter: Velocity Drop Programming.


Research shows that velocity loss, or velocity drop, programming can result in equal or greater strength gains than performing a set to failure [4, 1, 2]. This holds true despite the decrease in reps and reported fatigue.


In this post we’ll explain what velocity loss programming is, the science behind it, and how devices like Perch can be used to implement.


Velocity drop programming is simple. Programming a set based on a velocity loss threshold instead of a specific number of reps (or reps until failure). The athlete will record the mean velocity of their first rep, which is generally the fastest, and then perform reps until the velocity drops a specific percentage [1, 3]. 

If Perch shows an athlete’s mean velocity on rep 1 was 1 m/s, and a 20% velocity drop is prescribed, the athlete will perform maximal effort reps until the mean velocity drops below 0.8 m/s.


Velocity drop is an objective, non-invasive measure of fatigue levels. This makes it a great way to monitor an athlete throughout a session and account for daily fluctuations [3]. A study completed in 2011 found a nearly perfect correlation between mean propulsive velocity loss and increase in lactate levels, a known chemical measure of fatigue [3]. This correlation was present for both bench press and squat [3].

The difference in these two fatigue indicators is huge: Measuring lactate levels requires analyzing a small amount of blood drawn from a fingertip in a lactate analyzer before and after a set [3]. Measuring velocity loss simply requires looking at the data displayed instantly on Perch’s tablet.

As an athlete fatigues, their muscle fibers’ ability to generate force declines [3]. This leads to unintentional decreases in all of force, velocity, and power. If fatigue reaches a certain point, measured metabolically through lactate and ammonia levels, recovery time can become unnecessarily long [3, 1]. With velocity drop programming, fatigue levels and recovery time can be reduced. This is done through programming sets with low or moderate velocity loss. This will not reduce strength gains. Therefore, continuing to safely and efficiently progress an athlete without negatively impacting performance.


The proper velocity loss threshold for each exercise is still being determined, but two things that seem certain are that it depends on the desired training outcome and the exercise [4, 1, 3]. 

Larger velocity loss thresholds (about 30%-40%) will be closer to performing a set to failure and will result in greater muscle hypertrophy. This also may result in reduced velocity [4, 2]. Smaller velocity loss thresholds (about 10%-25%) results in greater strength and power, and less perceived fatigue [4, 1]. Velocity loss thresholds around 10% are most beneficial when competitions are close. This is when developing muscular power is the goal, or in sports that require greater kinematic outputs, such as throwing events [4].

These thresholds can also change based on the exercise. For example, a bench press has a lower minimum velocity than a squat, so the velocity loss threshold should be set to a greater percentage for a bench press [4].



A 2016 study found that a 20% velocity loss threshold training program resulted in similar squat strength gains and greater countermovement jump height improvements as an identical program that was performed with a 40% velocity loss threshold [1]. Overall, the 20% velocity loss threshold group performed nearly 40% less repetitions and 36% less “work” than the 40% velocity loss group, but saw similar or better results [1]. Basically, the group that did less improved more.

The research was further supported by a 2017 study. Researchers found that professional soccer players that trained with a 15% velocity loss program saw similar improvement in squat strength and endurance performance, along with greater improvements in countermovement jump height, than a group of players that trained with a 30% velocity loss program [2]. 

The two studies suggest that at worst, velocity loss programming with lower velocity loss thresholds results in similar strength gains with less work. At best, improvements are greater despite significantly less repetitions and fatigue.


Perch is a great tool for implementing velocity loss programming! With a few simple steps and a Perch unit, it can be added to any program: 

  1. Using the information above, pick a velocity loss threshold
    • You can set velocity thresholds in the tablet app settings for each lift
    • If you choose to display these and use different colors for fast vs slow reps, you will get visual feedback rep after rep
  2. Perform one rep and look at the average velocity instantly output on the Perch tablet
  3. Perform reps until the velocity falls below the threshold

Have questions? Feel free to reach out!


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .


  1. Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L, et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2016;27(7):724-735. doi:10.1111/sms.12678
  2. Pareja-Blanco F, Sánchez-Medina L, Suárez-Arrones L, González-Badillo JJ. Effects of Velocity Loss During Resistance Training on Performance in Professional Soccer Players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2017;12(4):512-519. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0170
  3. SÁNCHEZ-MEDINA LUIS, GONZÁLEZ-BADILLO JUANJOSÉ. Velocity Loss as an Indicator of Neuromuscular Fatigue during Resistance Training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011;43(9):1725-1734. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318213f880
  4. Weakley J, McLaren S, Ramirez-Lopez C, et al. Application of velocity loss thresholds during free-weight resistance training: Responses and reproducibility of perceptual, metabolic, and neuromuscular outcomes. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019;38(5):477-485. doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1706831

We’ve previously written about muscular anatomy and how muscles work to contract to perform a lift, but that still leaves a question unanswered. How do muscles actually grow and how do they adapt to make you stronger? And how does muscle growth and VBT interact?


To begin to explain this, there are 2 basic ways to get stronger: neural adaptations and muscular hypertrophy. 


Neural adaptations are responsible for the majority of strength gains at the beginning of a training program. It is also responsible for many of the changes seen with fast velocity training [5]. Neural adaptations are also responsible for some increases in force at slow and fast velocities [4]. 

The functional unit responsible for sending signals from a motor neuron to the muscle is called a motor unit. Each muscle has several motor units that can send a signal to all the muscle fibers it’s attached to. This signal instructs the muscle to contract. The more motor units recruited, the stronger the muscle contraction will be [4].

An untrained muscle won’t be able to activate all of a muscle’s motor units [2-3]. This is where training comes in, teaching your brain how to purposefully activate more motor neurons. This results in the recruitment of more motor units, and a stronger muscle contraction [1-3]. Training also teaches motor neurons to fire together and at a faster rate [1, 3]. When each motor neuron and subsequent motor unit fires in sync, the muscle is able to produce a stronger contraction.

Different muscle groups rely on firing rate and recruitment to different extents. Research has shown that smaller muscle groups like the muscles of the hand rely almost entirely on increasing firing rate to develop more force. Bigger muscles like the biceps and quadriceps use recruitment to increase force, while firing rate stays consistent until very high loads [2].

In a traditional percentage based program, these neural adaptations are the initial adaptations occurring with lighter loads of about 15-40% 1RM. Muscle growth and VBT corresponds to velocities greater than 1.3 m/s. 


Studies have begun to show fast velocity movements can cause motor units to defy the size principle [2]. The size principle states that smaller motor units are recruited before bigger ones. However, typically smaller motor units produce slower and weaker twitches. Defying the size principle allows muscles to go straight to the fast and strong big motor units, where powerful movements occur quicker.




The size principle tells us that neural adaptations also occur at slower velocities with high loads, the most sure way to teach the brain how to activate all motor units [4]. As loads increase to the 40-60% 1RM range and velocity decreases to about 0.75-1.3m/s, neural adaptations continue to teach motor units to fire more effectively. At this more effective stage, muscle hypertrophy occurs.

In a typical PBT, this range is where power develops – in VBT this range is broken down into the “Speed-Strength” and “Strength-Speed.” The combination of neural adaptations and hypertrophy helps move the entire force-velocity profile to the right, the resulting in a balanced, increased power production.


Hypertrophy is the physical growth of muscle cells by developing thicker and more numerous myosin filaments. The increase in filament size and number leads to greater force and power [3]. Hypertrophy typically occurs at slower velocities with high loads closer to an athlete’s 1RM [2, 4, 5]. This is why the trait commonly known as “hypertrophy” in traditional percentage based training is trained at “Accelerative Strength” or at speeds between .5 and .75 m/s. VBT programs like Perch make it easy to find these velocity ranges.

When lifting a load greater than what the body is used to, the sarcolemma and the myofibrils in the muscle fibers are damaged [5]. In the next 24-48 hours, the damaged muscle fibers are repaired and hypertrophy can occur. To repair the damaged muscle fibers, protein synthesis must be greater than the rate of protein depletion [1, 5]. If this is not the case, the muscles can be destroyed rather than grow. This is why rest and diet are so important after a workout in addition to ensuring each training session accounts for stress and fatigue for each athlete [5].

The increased number and thickness of myofibrils leads to hypertrophy, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that the size of the muscle or limb is larger. Research shows that the density of myosin filament can increase as much as 50% before any increase in limb girth occurs. In a recent study, after training there was no increase in limb girth, but there was a 40% increase in strength due to the increased density, force per area, and potentially neural adaptations as mentioned above [3].

Hypertrophy takes much longer to occur than neural adaptations. This is why most strength gains at the beginning of a training program can be attributed to increased motor unit recruitment or firing rate, regardless of velocity and load [1]. Once hypertrophy occurs, it is responsible for the majority of force generation improvements. It will also be trained through a combination of increased load and velocities, to maximize force production.


Much is still unknown about how muscles adapt physically to different loads and velocities. Existing research suggests that pairing fast velocity movements with slower, heavier load movements can lead to the greatest strength and power improvements [6].

Incorporating both slow and fast maximal effort resistance training into a program can help muscle fibers convert from slower type I oxidative fibers to the stronger and faster type II muscle fibers [3, 6]. This combination helps athletes achieve increased velocity for muscle shortening and increased muscle fiber strength, ultimately improving power and moves the force-velocity curve to the right [3, 6].

Measuring this throughout training will help to achieve these strength and power goals. At faster velocities, and consequently lighter loads, most strength gains will be due to neural adaptations. Closer to a 1RM, most improvements will be due to hypertrophy, or muscle growth. In the middle velocities, there will be a combination of neural adaptations and muscle hypertrophy. Muscle growth and VBT are inseparable as VBT allows for the tracking of neural adaptations leading to hypertrophy, and Perch can help coaches and athletes program workouts at proper velocities to see strength development occur at the neurological and hypertrophic levels.


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .


  1. Andrews MAW. How does exercise make your muscles stronger? Scientific American.,to%20the%20stress%20of%20training.&text=Because%20there%20are%20more%20potential,muscle%20can%20exhibit%20greater%20strength. Published October 27, 2003. Accessed May 19, 2021.
  2. Behm DG, Sale DG. Velocity Specificity of Resistance Training. Sports Medicine. 1993;15(6):374-388. doi:10.2165/00007256-199315060-00003
  3. Jones DA, Rutherford OM, Parker DF. PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES IN SKELETAL MUSCLE AS A RESULT OF STRENGTH TRAINING. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology. 1989;74(3):233-256. doi:10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003268
  4. Kawamori N, Haff GG. The Optimal Training Load for the Development of Muscular Power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004;18(3):675-684. doi:10.1519/00124278-200408000-00051
  5. Leyva J. How Do Muscles Grow? The Science of Muscle Growth. BuiltLean. Published December 31, 2020. Accessed May 19, 2021.
  6. Wilson JM, Loenneke JP, Jo E, Wilson GJ, Zourdos MC, Kim J-S. The Effects of Endurance, Strength, and Power Training on Muscle Fiber Type Shifting. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012;26(6):1724-1729. doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e318234eb6f 
  7. Baechle, T., Earle, R., & National Strength & Conditioning Association (U.S.). (2008). Essentials of strength training and conditioning (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

If you are a new reader to this blog space, every few months we like to break down some of the best and/or most recent velocity based training research. Sometimes it is directly related to VBT, sometimes it is broadly related to strength & conditioning. Either way, we provide the citation, a brief synopsis of methods and results, and leave the rest up to you. This week we wanted to bring you two recently released research articles closely related to velocity based training. Without further ado, here is our 5th research review:



Researchers Dorrell, Moore, and Gee recruited 19 trained male subjects (23.6 ± 3.7 years) and randomly assigned them to either the Individual Load Velocity Profile (ILVP) group or Group Load Velocity Profile (GLVP) group. The purpose of the study was to determine whether improvements in performance were greater in the individual load velocity profiles or group load velocity profiles. Subjects were all tested in the back squat one repetition maximum (1RM), load-velocity profiling (LVP), countermovement (CMJ), static-squat (SSJ) and standing broad (SBJ) jump tests before and after 6 weeks of resistance training. Upon retesting of all subjects, results indicated that jump performance significantly increased for the ILVP group (p < 0.01; CMJ: 6.6%; SSJ: 4.6%; SBJ: 6.7%), with only CMJ and SSJ improving for the GLVP group (p < 0.05; 4.3%). The back squat 1RM increased significantly for both the ILVP (p < 0.01; 9.7%) and GLVP groups (p < 0.01; 7.2%). While both interventions yielded positive results, researchers suggested the findings proved that the individualized approach may lead to greater improvements.

Dorrell, H. F., Moore, J. M., & Gee, T. I. (2020). Comparison of individual and group-based load-velocity profiling as a means to dictate training load over a 6-week strength and power intervention. Journal of Sports Sciences.

velocity based training research review 5 blog post



Researchers Moore & Dorrell utilized multitudes of existing research to develop guidelines for prescribing load through the use of velocity based training. When prescribing load, coaches often have no means of taking velocity into account, and adapting training loads for the varying fluctuations in physiological conditions athletes can be in day to day. The researchers developed an app that can assist in prescription (linked below). While this was primarily a review of existing research, the investigators highlighted the importance of load/velocity profiles: “LVPs have been shown to remain unchanged despite significant increases in absolute strength and have therefore been theorised as a potential auto-regulatory approach for prescribing training load.” This research largely cited the first study we reviewed in this article.

Load/Velocity Calculator Here

Moore, J., & Dorrell, H. (2020). Guidelines and Resources for Prescribing Load using Velocity Based Training. IUSCA Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from

Also check out our Perch post on Understanding Force/Velocity Profiles


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .

This week we introduce our final installment of the Return to Play series of how weight room technology can help get athletes back and better than ever with # 6: Enhance a Competitive Atmosphere, Safely. Athletes are competitive by nature! Coaches love a good competition, athletes love it too, but sometimes the competitive drive can overpower the body’s need for rest. This is where weight room technology can come in handy to help facilitate competition safely.


Athletes will most likely be itching to get back to campus, load the barbell up with weight, and lift the same weight they had lifted before they left. If they haven’t touched these loads in months, this can be dangerous. To build an environment of long-term athlete success, return to play has to planned and executed to promote safety and an encouraging environment. Velocity and power output provides other metrics on which athletes can focus. These metrics aren’t just about brute strength, but focus on explosiveness and speed. These attributes will carry over onto the field of play. The metrics can also be used to compete against themselves and each other day to day, without risking overtraining or injury under load.

No matter what we were doing we were using velocity to measure load. The athletes loved it. It was an easy transition because it created a really competitive environment, it was an easy process for the players. They were competing between racks and really trying to get better.

Tony Smith, Director of Strength & Conditioning, Gaffney High School

velocity based training, return to play, competitive atmosphere

By utilizing weight room technology, and velocity based training specifically, athletes can compete with each other on a level playing field. In this way, they’ll be able to bring out the best in each other and do so with coaches watching and the objective metric of velocity or power output informing when fatigue sets in. The introduction of VBT to a weight room environment can help both enhance and facilitate competition, meet athletes where they’re at, and help get athletes better every day.


Check out Tony Smith’s coaches corner:

Check out other posts in our Return to Play series:


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .

This week we are returning with more of our 6 Key Ways Weight Room Monitoring Can Help Return Athletes to Play. Number 5: Increase Frequency of Training. By continually monitoring readiness and fatigue, velocity based training allows athletes to remain healthy and fresh from session to session. Train them with increased specificity, keep them healthy, and you will be able to increase training frequency with an additional velocity metric assisting in dictating session intensity and volume.

training frequency, Perch, Velocity Based Training


When athletes return to campus, they may only have a few short weeks to get ready for competition. With velocity, a coach can closely monitor strength gains and fatigue. With this information, the coach can safely increase the frequency and monitor the volume of training and be confident that he or she isn’t putting athletes at risk of overtraining. Using velocity to monitor readiness and fatigue will enable coaches to prescribe the appropriate load and volume every time.

I can work kids out on game day. I can train them 4 or 5 days a week and I can guarantee it won’t negatively impact their performance with data…They need more development which means they need more frequency and training time. Coaches out of fear of losing performance just don’t give them the reps or the training load they need out of fear of hurting performance.

Spencer Arnold, Director of Strength & Conditioning, Hebron Christian Academy

training frequency, Perch, Velocity Based Training

Studies have shown that Velocity Based Training can yield similar and better sports-performance results than traditional percentage based training and do so with lower volume and load performed (Dorrell, Smith, & Gee, 2019). This is great news from an overall workload perspective. Moreover, by preventing overtraining and reducing injury risk by adhering to an athletes’ abilities, training frequency and session intensity can still remain high by providing just the right amount of stimulus every time. Taking the guesswork out of prescribing volume and intensity enables athletes to perform better both in the weight room and on the field, where it counts the most.


More in our Return to Play series


Keep checking back for more velocity based training content, tips, tricks, and tools. And don’t forget to follow us on Twitter , Instagram and Linkedin and like us on Facebook .

1 2 3 6